Direct Corrective Feedback in Improving Students’ Writing Ability

  • M Syamsir STIK Stella Maris Makassar
Keywords: Corrective feedback, writing ability

Abstract

The objective of the research was to find out whether or not the use of direct corrective feedback could improve the students’ writing ability to the fourth semester students of Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keperawatan (STIK) Stella Maris Makassar. The researcher applied quasi-experimental method using non-equivalent control class design. The Population of this research was the fourth semester students of Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keperawatan (STIK) Stella Maris Makassar in academic year 2013/2014. The sample was class A and class B, which consists of 80 students. This research used cluster random sampling. The researcher chose two classes of the fourth semester students of Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keperawatan (STIK) Stella Maris Makassar randomly, as the experimental class and the control class. The two classes were given treatment. The experimental class was treated by direct corrective feedback while the control class was taught with usual interaction feedback. The data were collected through writing test. The result of the data analysis showed that there was significant difference between the students’ score who were taught by using direct feedback and only with usual interaction feedback. It is proved by the mean score of the experimental class is higher than control class in the posttest. Moreover, the result of test of significant analysis indicates that the use of corrective direct feedback significantly improve the students’ writing ability. Based on the result, it could be concluded that the use direct of corrective feedback improved the students’ writing ability of the fourth semester students of Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Keperawatan (STIK) Stella Maris Makassar in academic year 2013/2014.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abisamra, S. N. (2001). Teaching writing, approaches and activities. Available Online http://www.nadasisland.com/writing/ Accessed 7th December 2010.

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form fee.

Byrne, D. (1990). Teaching writing skills. New York: Longman.

Cardelle, M, & Corno, L. (1981). Effects of second language learning of variations in written feedback on homework assignments. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3), 251-261.

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education,31(2), 219-233.

Ghaith, G. (2002). The Nature of Writing Process, Approaches, Model, and Process Activities. Available Online http://www.ghaith.tsx.org Accessed 3rd December 2010.

Gulcat, Z. & Ozagac, O. (2004). Correcting and giving feedback to writing. Bogazici: University SFL.

Imeldi, M. (2001). Facilitating the first semester of English department students in writing class. Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: FBS UNM.

Jacobs, H. L. (1981). Testing ESL composition: a practical approach. London: Newbury House Publishers Inc.

Kroma, S. (1988). Action Research in teaching composition. London: Longman.

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of educational research, 47(1), 211-232.

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English. New York: Pearson Longman.

Savage, A. & Shafiei, M. (2007). Effective academic writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Williams, J. (2005). Teaching writing in a second and foreign language classrooms. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Published
29-02-2016
How to Cite
Syamsir, M. (2016). Direct Corrective Feedback in Improving Students’ Writing Ability. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 3(1), 22-35. Retrieved from https://ethicallingua.org/25409190/article/view/111
Section
Regular Articles