The Challenges of Taking TOEIC Test and How to Overcome: Perception of Indonesian Vocational Students

  • Nurul Amalia Zahruni Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Fahmi Fahmi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Bambang Widi Pratolo Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Keywords: TOEIC, vocational students, listening, reading

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to discover problems that Indonesian Vocational Students are having with the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) to improve TOEIC instruction. The participants were 18 students in school attending the TOEIC preparation course in the TOEIC course in October 2018. There were two steps in taking the data: (1) questionnaires on the listening and reading problems in the TOEIC test, and (2) interview on how they cope with the problems. The result shows that: 1) The majority of subjects had no experience in TOEIC and most of them did not have any preparation for the test; 2) Listening problems were at a high level in questionnaires 100% for the lack in vocabulary; 3) Reading problems were at a high level in questionnaires 100% for unknowing the meaning based on the context of the text; 4) The interview results showed that the students solve the problem in TOEIC test with learning by themselves, discuss with a partner and learning on the internet. The researchers recommend that the TOEIC course should include vocabulary building and be conducted frequently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Nurul Amalia Zahruni, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Student of Master Program of English Language Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Bambang Widi Pratolo, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Lecturer at Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Master Program of English Language Education

References

Bao, X. M. (2002). A Comparative Study of Library Surveys of Internet Users at Seton Hall University in 1998 and 2001. College & Research Libraries, 63 (3), 251-259.

Bitchener, J. Stuart, Y. Denise, C. 2005. The Effects of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205.

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carney, N. (2016). Gauging Extensive Reading’s Relationship with TOEIC Reading Score Growth. Journal of Extensive Reading, 4(4), 69-86. http://jalt-publications.org/jer/

Chapman, M. & Newfields, T. (2008). The ‘New’ TOEIC. SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12(2), 32-37. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from http://jalt.org/test/cha_new.htm

Childs, M. (1995). Good and bad uses of TOEIC by Japanese companies. In J.D. Brown and S.O. Yamashita. Language Testing in Japan. JALT, 66-75.

Cohen, A. D. (2009). The Coming of Age of Research on Test-taking Strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(4), 307 – 331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701333129

Damrongpanit, S., & Reungtragu, A. (2013). Matching of learning styles and teaching styles: Advantage and disadvantage on ninth-grade students’ academic achievements. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(20), 1937-1947.

Grace, F. (2015) Learning Styles, Teaching Strategies and Academic Achievement among some Psychology Undergraduates in Barbados. Caribbean Educational Research Journal, 3(2), 46-61.

Hamouda, A. (2013). An Investigation of Listening Comprehension Problems Encountered by Saudi Students in the EL Listening Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113-15.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College Students’ Academic Stress and Its Relation to Their Anxiety, Time Management, and Leisure Satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16, 41-51.

Saaristo, P. (2015). Grammar is the heart of language: Grammar and its role in language learning among Finnish University students. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas. Voices of pedagogical development – Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning. 279-318. Dublin: Research-publishing.net. DOI:10.14705/rpnet.2015000296.

Sewell, H. D. (2005). The TOEIC: Reliability and Validity within the Korean Context. Available: https://www.birminghamdevl.bham.ac.uk/account/accessdenied.aspx?ReturnURL=htto%3a. Accesssed on December 22, 2019.

TOEIC Examinee Handbook. (1996). Educational Testing Services. London: The Chauncey Group Ltd. Accessed on November 20, 2019 from https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/listening-reading-examinee-handbook.pdf

Tokunaga, M. (2008). Students’ assumptions for TOEIC classes. JALT 2007 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT, The Educational Testing.

Published
12-04-2020
How to Cite
Zahruni, N. A., Fahmi, F., & Pratolo, B. W. (2020). The Challenges of Taking TOEIC Test and How to Overcome: Perception of Indonesian Vocational Students. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 7(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.167
Section
Regular Articles – Language