The Effect of MMS (Metacognitive, Monitoring, Summarizing) Strategy in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension

  • Zuhad Ahmad Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Widi Sriyanto Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif Jakarta Indonesia
Keywords: Reading, Teaching Method, Metacognitive Monitoring and Summarizing

Abstract

This study aimed to find out a significant influence from the use of Metacognitive, Monitoring, and Summarizing (MMS). This research used quantitative with an experimental design using 2 class samples (control class and experimental class) which was randomly selected and each class consisted of 30 students as respondents. Data collection used tests to determine students’ reading skills. The data that has been obtained was analyzed using the t-test in SPSS. Based on the results obtained that the t-count is 0.001 which is lower than

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Journal.
Brown, Douglas, H. (2001). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pendagogy Second Edition. New York : Addison Wesley Longman.
Camahalan, F. M. G. (2006). Effects of a metacognitive reading program on the reading achievements and metacognitive strategies of students with cases of Dyslexia. Eric Journal, 43(2), 77-93.
Dirkes, and M.Ann. (2010). Metacognition: students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, vol. 8, pp. 96-100.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Gómez, Ángela, and Sanjosé, Vicente. (2012). Effectiveness of comprehension monitoring strategies in EFL of non-bilingual Spanish university students reading science texts. Revista Electrónica De Lingüística Aplicada. Vol. 11, 87-103.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Khathayut, Phanlapa & Karavi, Premin. (2011). Summarizing Techniques: The Effective Indicators of Reading Comprehension. The Third International Converence on Hummanities and Social Sciences.3 (3):1-12.
Khoshima, Hooshang & Tiyar, Forouzan Rezaeian. (2014). The effect of summarizing strategy on readingcomprehension of Iranian upper mediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2(3): 134-139.
Klinger, Janette, K, Sharon Vaughn, Alison Boardman. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York. The Guilford Press.
McMahon, W, W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
Naseri, Hangameh, Assadi, Nader & Zoghi, Masoud. (2013). The Effect of Taeaching Systemic-Oriented Summarization Strategies on the Reading Comprehension of Advanced Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW). 4(4):74-87.
Nurhayati, Wahyu Astuti Dwi & Fitriana, Wilda Maylia. (2018). Effectiveness of summarizing in teaching reading comprehension for EFL students. IJOLTL, 3(1): 33-50.
Pakzadian, Maryam & Rasekh, Abbas .E. (2012). The Effects of Using Summarization Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. English Linguistics Research.1 (1):118-125.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York: Guilford.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Snow, Catherine. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for Understanding : Toward an R&D Program and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica. P. 11.http://www.dsusd.k12.ca.us/users/christopherg/reading%20program%20for%20teachers.pdf.
Usman, Bustami, Aziz, Zulfadli A., and Absida, Nova Riska. (2017). Improving reading comprehension using metacognitive strategies. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(4), 425-438.
Weaver, Constance. (2009). Reading Process: Brief Edition of Reading Process and Practice 3rd ed. Portsmouth NH. Heinemann.
Zhang, L. A., & Sheepo, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.
Zohar, A, and Barizilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, vol. 49, pp. 121-169.
Published
30-04-2021
How to Cite
Ahmad, Z., & Sriyanto, W. (2021). The Effect of MMS (Metacognitive, Monitoring, Summarizing) Strategy in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 254-259. Retrieved from https://ethicallingua.org/25409190/article/view/231
Section
Regular Articles – Language