The Effect of MMS (Metacognitive, Monitoring, Summarizing) Strategy in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension
This study aimed to find out a significant influence from the use of Metacognitive, Monitoring, and Summarizing (MMS). This research used quantitative with an experimental design using 2 class samples (control class and experimental class) which was randomly selected and each class consisted of 30 students as respondents. Data collection used tests to determine students’ reading skills. The data that has been obtained was analyzed using the t-test in SPSS. Based on the results obtained that the t-count is 0.001 which is lower than
Brown, Douglas, H. (2001). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pendagogy Second Edition. New York : Addison Wesley Longman.
Camahalan, F. M. G. (2006). Effects of a metacognitive reading program on the reading achievements and metacognitive strategies of students with cases of Dyslexia. Eric Journal, 43(2), 77-93.
Dirkes, and M.Ann. (2010). Metacognition: students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, vol. 8, pp. 96-100.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Gómez, Ángela, and Sanjosé, Vicente. (2012). Effectiveness of comprehension monitoring strategies in EFL of non-bilingual Spanish university students reading science texts. Revista Electrónica De Lingüística Aplicada. Vol. 11, 87-103.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2001). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Khathayut, Phanlapa & Karavi, Premin. (2011). Summarizing Techniques: The Effective Indicators of Reading Comprehension. The Third International Converence on Hummanities and Social Sciences.3 (3):1-12.
Khoshima, Hooshang & Tiyar, Forouzan Rezaeian. (2014). The effect of summarizing strategy on readingcomprehension of Iranian upper mediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2(3): 134-139.
Klinger, Janette, K, Sharon Vaughn, Alison Boardman. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York. The Guilford Press.
McMahon, W, W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
Naseri, Hangameh, Assadi, Nader & Zoghi, Masoud. (2013). The Effect of Taeaching Systemic-Oriented Summarization Strategies on the Reading Comprehension of Advanced Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW). 4(4):74-87.
Nurhayati, Wahyu Astuti Dwi & Fitriana, Wilda Maylia. (2018). Effectiveness of summarizing in teaching reading comprehension for EFL students. IJOLTL, 3(1): 33-50.
Pakzadian, Maryam & Rasekh, Abbas .E. (2012). The Effects of Using Summarization Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. English Linguistics Research.1 (1):118-125.
Pressley, M. (2006). Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York: Guilford.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Snow, Catherine. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for Understanding : Toward an R&D Program and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica. P. 11.http://www.dsusd.k12.ca.us/users/christopherg/reading%20program%20for%20teachers.pdf.
Usman, Bustami, Aziz, Zulfadli A., and Absida, Nova Riska. (2017). Improving reading comprehension using metacognitive strategies. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(4), 425-438.
Weaver, Constance. (2009). Reading Process: Brief Edition of Reading Process and Practice 3rd ed. Portsmouth NH. Heinemann.
Zhang, L. A., & Sheepo, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.
Zohar, A, and Barizilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, vol. 49, pp. 121-169.
Copyright (c) 2021 Zuhad Ahmad, Widi Sriyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting the manuscript of the article, the authors agree with this policy with no specific document sign-off required.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe the rights of others).
- they agree to Ethical Lingua license and copyright agreement.
All articles published by Ethical Lingua are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Ethical Lingua.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Ethical Lingua.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.