Causative Constructions in Belitong Language

  • I Nyoman Pasek Darmawan Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Nurachman Hanafi Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Lalu Muhaimi Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Untung Waluyo Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Kamaludin Yusra Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Keywords: analytic causative, morphological causative, relational grammar

Abstract

This study analyses and describes the phenomenon of valency-raising in Belitong language through causativization strategy. This study is conducted under the qualitative descriptive study alongside Relational Grammar (RG) theory. The process of collecting data is done in the forms of elicitation technique, interview with the native speakers, and documentation of the previous studies as well as some additional works of literature. The data were analysed carefully by following six procedural steps of the technique of analysing qualitative data proposed by Creswell (2009). The results of this study showed that: (1) Belitong accounts for two types of causative construction: morphological and analytic causative; (2) morphological causatives are signalled out by certain markers like suffixes -an, -ek, -kan or zero marker ; and (3) analytic causatives are indicated by the insertion of the productive causative additional verbs such as muat, isak, gara-gara, nyuro, base, melasa, karne, and muji. To sum up, the revaluation principles for morphological causatives constructions are designated as 1–2 (causative); OBL–2, 2–Cho (applicative-causative) for intransitive clause; 1–2, 2–Cho (monotransitive); and 1–2, 2–Cho, OBL–OBL (transitive). Conversely, analytic causatives account for a relational structure such as 1–2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, S. S., Abubakar, T., & Alwi, Z. (2002). Sistem Reduplikasi Bahasa Melayu Belitung. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Aronoff, K., & Fudeman, K. (2011). What is Morphology. (2nd ed). United States: Wiley-Blackwell.

Blake, B. J. (1990). Relational Grammar. London: Routledge.

Brahma, D. (2017). Causative Verb Formation in Bodo Language, International Research Journal of Humanities, Language and Literature, 4(2), 1-12.

Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (3rd ed). USA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Hanafi, N. (2006). Problema Bahasa Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Tata Bahasa Relational. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Jerro, K. (2017). The Causative-Instrumental Syncretism. Journal of Linguistics, 53(4), 1-38. doi: 10.1017/S0022226717000044.

Mulyadi. (2004). Konstruksi Kausatif dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Linguistika, 11(21), 133-145.

Napsin, S., Usman, M. Y., Zein, R. M. S., Tarmizi, Sudarmo, & Silahiddin, S. (1986). Morfologi dan Sintaksis Bahasa Melayu Belitung. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Published
13-04-2021
How to Cite
Darmawan, I. N. P., Hanafi, N., Muhaimi, L., Waluyo, U., & Yusra, K. (2021). Causative Constructions in Belitong Language. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 8-17. Retrieved from https://ethicallingua.org/25409190/article/view/245
Section
Regular Articles – Linguistics